QS
Sheffield QS Dashboard
QS
QS Consultancy
Confidential — Sheffield Strategic Analysis

Sheffield Competitive Market Position

QS Subject Rankings Analysis Dashboard 2024–2025

A comprehensive analysis of Sheffield's global subject ranking performance, competitive positioning, and strategic reputation opportunities across 16 ranked subjects.

Global #1 Subject
Library & Info. Mgmt
Perfect AR score (100)
Subjects Ranked Globally
16
QS 2025 cycle
Avg. Citations per Paper
90.1
+3.6 above peer avg
Avg. Academic Reputation
71.5
vs. 70.0 peer avg
Avg. Employer Reputation
67.2
−2.7 vs. peer avg
Top 50 Subjects
4
LIM, Arch, DevStud, Geo
EX
Overarching Executive Summary

University of Sheffield
Market Position 2025

1

Market Position Overview

The University of Sheffield enters the 2025 QS Subject Rankings cycle with a distinctive competitive profile: a single globally dominant subject (Library & Information Management, #1 worldwide), a cluster of emerging Top 50 performers (Archaeology #29, Development Studies #36, Geography #39, Architecture #44), and a broader portfolio of 12 additional subjects ranked within the global Top 200. Sheffield's 16-subject ranked portfolio is comparable in breadth to other Northern England Russell Group institutions — but this breadth has not translated into depth of excellence. Only 4 subjects rank in the Top 50, compared to Manchester's significantly stronger elite-tier representation.

2

Key Competitive Insights

Sheffield's most powerful strategic insight is the 'research-reputation gap.' Across its core subjects, Sheffield's research output metrics (Citations per Paper: 90.1, H-index: 83.4) consistently outperform its reputation metrics (Academic Reputation: 71.5, Employer Reputation: 67.2). This 19-23 point gap represents the single largest opportunity for rank improvement without additional research investment. In the QS methodology, where Academic Reputation typically carries 40-90% weight, closing even half of this gap could shift Sheffield's positioning in 15+ subjects simultaneously.

3

Strategic Priorities for Reputation Building

Priority 1 — Protect the #1 Position: Library & Information Management requires sustained, proactive defence. Maintain global conference leadership, industry advisory presence, and international collaboration networks that underpin its perfect reputation scores.
Priority 2 — Consolidate Rising Stars: Development Studies (+39 positions) and Geography (+36) achieved breakthrough gains in 2025. These gains must be consolidated through immediate reputation-building activity — targeted academic survey engagement, practitioner network expansion, and employer outreach.
Priority 3 — Arrest Engineering Decline: Engineering - Mechanical (-17 positions) and Engineering - Chemical (#101-150) represent an identity crisis for a university historically associated with engineering excellence. Intervention should include: industry partnership visibility programmes, employer advisory board reactivation, and international research network strengthening.
Priority 4 — Close the Employer Reputation Gap: At 67.2 vs peer average 69.9, Sheffield's Employer Reputation is the single most impactful deficit. A coordinated employer engagement programme focused on Sheffield's Top 10 subjects could shift this dimension by 3-5 points within 2 ranking cycles.
Priority 5 — Strategic Subject Triage: Computer Science (#191), Business (#201-250), and Economics (#201-250) require honest assessment. Sheffield should determine whether targeted investment can achieve meaningful rank improvement, or whether resources would yield greater return if redirected to strengthening subjects closer to breakpoint positions.
4

Reputation-Building Roadmap

1
Immediate0–6 months

Launch targeted academic engagement campaign for Development Studies, Geography, and Archaeology — the subjects with highest 'reputation conversion potential.' Focus: international visiting scholar programmes, practitioner workshop series, and strategic editorial board participation. Target: +3-5 points Academic Reputation by 2026 survey cycle.

2
Medium-term6–18 months

Develop employer engagement infrastructure for Engineering, Architecture, and Materials Science — subjects where Sheffield's research quality (CPP 85-90) significantly exceeds employer recognition (ER 62-70). Target: +5 points Employer Reputation across Engineering portfolio.

3
Long-term18–36 months

Build strategic international research networks in subjects where IRN data is currently unavailable or below threshold. Sheffield should target partnerships with institutions in the Asia-Pacific and Middle East regions where QS survey participation is growing fastest.

4
MonitoringOngoing

Track QS survey raw scores (available through QS Intelligence Unit) annually. Monitor the Academic Reputation / Research Output gap as the primary strategic KPI. Target: reduce the 19-point gap between CPP (90.1) and AR (71.5) to under 12 points by 2027.

"Sheffield's research excellence is already world-class. The strategic imperative is to ensure that the global academic and employer communities recognise what Sheffield already delivers."

QS Consultancy — University of Sheffield Market Position Analysis 2025

01
Visual 01

Peer Rank Comparison Heatmap

Sheffield's subject portfolio vs. 11 peer institutions — 2025 QS World University Rankings by Subject

#1–5
#6–10
#11–20
#21–50
#51–100
#101–150
151+/NR
Sheffield
SubjectSheffieldLeedsNottinghamNewcastleBirminghamManchesterWarwickEdinburghBathDurhamSurreyExeter
Library & Info. Mgmt120
Archaeology29201+101-15051-100151-20051-100151-20029645
Development Studies3622101-15051-10051-1001151-10051-10051-100101-150
Geography392351-1003651-10018211140
Architecture44101-15051-10051-100201+51-10051-100
Engineering - Civil51-10051-10051-100101-150101-15051-100151-20051-100151-200201+151-200
Anatomy51-1003751-10051-10036293351-100
Communication51-10033101-150101-15051-10051-10051-10040151-200
Materials Science61136104251+6621151-200141251+201+
Arts & Humanities825412171723663104390
Eng. - Mechanical8810463201+822910694127
Politics8983101-150151-200101-150456431151-2007280
Sociology9381151-200151-20076206630101-15089201+151-200
English Language10036938229183473347
Dentistry51-12051-1202351-120
Eng. - Chemical101-1508492101-150751663101-150201+
02
Visual 02

Sheffield Indicator Profile

Performance across all 5 QS metric dimensions for Sheffield's 16 highest-ranked subjects (2025)

Academic Rep.
Employer Rep.
Citations/Paper
H-index
IRN
SubjectRankAcademic Rep.Employer Rep.Citations/PaperH-indexIRN
Library & Info. Mgmt#1
100.0
70.5
100.0
94.6
Archaeology#29
78.3
74.7
98.5
79.7
Development Studies#36
68.0
66.6
96.2
92.8
Geography#39
75.7
72.5
92.2
91.0
Architecture#44
71.7
70.4
90.6
81.9
Engineering - Civil51-100
73.0
62.3
88.2
81.9
Anatomy51-100
69.8
76.4
88.4
73.2
Communication51-100
74.6
63.9
87.2
76.1
Materials Science#61
75.6
66.9
85.7
76.7
79.2
Arts & Humanities#82
76.3
65.1
87.6
86.6
59.8
Eng. - Mechanical#88
68.6
72.0
89.2
80.6
79.4
Politics#89
62.6
64.8
93.1
91.2
Sociology#93
68.7
64.7
94.4
93.8
English Language#100
68.4
67.7
80.9
Dentistry51-120
47.3
46.4
84.6
77.5
Eng. - Chemical101-150
65.5
69.9
85.4
74.0
63.7
Avg. Academic Rep.
71.5
+1.5 vs peers
Avg. Employer Rep.
67.2
−2.7 vs peers
Avg. Citations/Paper
90.1
+3.6 vs peers
Avg. H-index
83.4
+3.8 vs peers
Avg. IRN
70.5
+0.5 vs peers
03
Visual 03

Peer Average Indicator Comparison

Sheffield's average scores vs. combined peer group average across 5 QS indicator dimensions (2025)

Academic ReputationEmployer ReputationCitations per PaperH-indexInt'l Research Network506580100
  • Sheffield
  • Peer Group Average
Academic Reputation
+1.5
vs peer avg
Employer Reputation
-2.7
vs peer avg
Citations per Paper
+3.6
vs peer avg
H-index
+3.8
vs peer avg
Int'l Research Network
+0.5
vs peer avg
04
Visual 04

Rank Trajectory 2024 → 2025

Year-over-year subject rank movement — improvements and declines across Sheffield's key subjects

3 Rising
5 Declining
3 Stable
Library & Info. Mgmt
2024:#1
● 0
2025:#1
Stable
Archaeology
2024:#29
● 0
2025:#29
Stable
Development Studies
2024:#75
▲ +39
2025:#36
Rising (+39)
Geography
2024:#75
▲ +36
2025:#39
Rising (+36)
Architecture
2024:#38
▼ 6
2025:#44
Declining (-6)
Materials Science
2024:#54
▼ 7
2025:#61
Declining (-7)
Arts & Humanities
2024:#82
● 0
2025:#82
Stable
Eng. - Mechanical
2024:#71
▼ 17
2025:#88
Declining (-17)
Politics
2024:#75
▼ 14
2025:#89
Declining (-14)
Sociology
2024:#87
▼ 6
2025:#93
Declining (-6)
English Language
2024:#125
▲ +25
2025:#100
Rising (+25)
05
Visual 05

UK Head-to-Head

Sheffield vs. Leeds, Nottingham & Manchester — direct subject-by-subject comparison (2025)

Sheffield
1
subjects led
Leeds
2
subjects led
Nottingham
1
subjects led
Manchester
11
subjects led
SubjectSheffieldLeedsNottinghamManchester
Development Studies3622101-15011
Geography392351-10018
Engineering - Civil51-10051-10051-10051-100
Anatomy51-1003751-10029
Communication51-10033101-15051-100
Materials Science6113610421
Arts & Humanities825412136
Eng. - Mechanical881046329
Politics8983101-15045
Sociology9381151-20020
English Language100369318
Eng. - Chemical101-150849216

★ = leading institution in that subject among the four rivals shown

06
Visual 06

Reputation Positioning Map

Academic Reputation vs. Employer Reputation — average scores across 16 subjects per institution (2025)

50596885Academic Reputation →55626982Employer Reputation →SheffieldLeedsNottinghamNewcastleBirminghamManchesterWarwickEdinburghBathDurhamSurreyExeter
InstitutionAcademic Rep.Employer Rep.Gap (AR−ER)Position
Edinburgh7877.2+0.8Elite Tier
Manchester7776.9+0.1Elite Tier
Durham74.170.7+3.4Mid-Tier
Warwick69.672.4-2.8Mid-Tier
Leeds69.869.4+0.4Developing
Sheffield71.567.2+4.3Mid-Tier
Birmingham68.767.2+1.5Developing
Exeter7164.7+6.3Mid-Tier
Nottingham6767.7-0.7Developing
Bath63.768.5-4.8Developing
Newcastle64.465.6-1.2Developing
Surrey54.660-5.4Developing
07
Visual 07

Specialist Advantage

Sheffield's Top 5 subjects vs. key peers — where Sheffield leads, matches, or trails (2025)

Sheffield
Manchester
Edinburgh
Leeds
Durham
Birmingham

Library & Info. Mgmt

★ Sheffield leads in this subject
#1
Sheffield
1
Manchester
20
Edinburgh
Not ranked
Leeds
Not ranked
Durham
Not ranked
Birmingham
Not ranked

Archaeology

#29
Sheffield
29
Manchester
51-100
Edinburgh
29
Leeds
201+
Durham
6
Birmingham
151-200

Development Studies

#36
Sheffield
36
Manchester
11
Edinburgh
51-100
Leeds
22
Durham
101-150
Birmingham
51-100

Geography

#39
Sheffield
39
Manchester
18
Edinburgh
21
Leeds
23
Durham
11
Birmingham
51-100

Architecture

★ Sheffield leads in this subject
#44
Sheffield
44
Manchester
Not ranked
Edinburgh
51-100
Leeds
101-150
Durham
Not ranked
Birmingham
201+
08
Visual 08

Strategic Positioning Matrix

Sheffield's subject portfolio classified into four strategic quadrants based on rank position and trajectory (2025)

⭐ Crown Jewels

Top 50 & Stable/Rising

4
#1
Stable
Library & Info. Mgmt
Global #1 — flagship subject, perfect AR score
#36
▲ +39
Development Studies
Breakthrough improvement — entering elite tier
#39
▲ +36
Geography
Strong upward momentum — near Top 30
#29
Stable
Archaeology
Consistent Top 30 performer

⚠️ At Risk

Top 100 but Declining

4
#44
▼ -6
Architecture
Slipped from Top 40 — competitive pressure from Asia-Pacific
#88
▼ -17
Eng. - Mechanical
Significant decline — urgent intervention needed
#89
▼ -14
Politics
Dropped out of 51-100 band to named rank — visibility loss
#93
▼ -6
Sociology
Gradual erosion — risk of falling to 101-150 band

🚀 Rising Stars

#51–150 and Improving

3
#100
▲ +25
English Language
Strong improvement — approaching Top 100 breakpoint
#101-150
▲ +50
Linguistics
Major jump from 151-200 band — watch for breakthrough
#61
Stable
Materials Science
Solid positioning with strong CPP (85.7)

📊 Challenge Areas

#101+ or Significant Decline

5
#101-150
Stable
Eng. - Chemical
Below expectations for Sheffield's engineering reputation
#101-150
▼ from 51-100
Philosophy
Significant decline — dropped entire band
#101-150
Stable
Nursing
Under-performing relative to research capacity
#191
Stable
Computer Science
Major gap vs. peers — reputation deficit evident
#201-250
Stable
Business & Mgmt
Limited visibility in competitive global field

Portfolio Summary

4
Crown Jewels
4
⚠At Risk
3
�Rising Stars
5
�Challenge Areas
09
Visual 09

QS Methodology: Indicator Weights by Subject

Each QS subject ranking uses a distinct weighting formula. Understanding the indicator split for Sheffield's 16 ranked subjects reveals where reputation surveys dominate — and where targeted engagement campaigns will have the greatest impact on rank.

Highest Rep. Weighting
90%
English Lit. & Architecture
Average Rep. Weighting
70%
Across all 16 subjects
Lowest Rep. Weighting
40%
Dentistry (citation-heavy)

Arts and Humanities

Archaeology
70%
10%
10%
10%
Architecture / Built Environment
70%
10%
10%
10%
English Language and Literature
80%
10%
10%
History
60%
10%
15%
15%
Philosophy
75%
10%
10%
Academic Reputation
Employer Reputation
Citations per Paper
H-Index
Indicator Weight Summary — All Sheffield Subjects
SubjectAcad. Rep.Emp. Rep.Cit./PaperH-IndexIRNRep. Total
Archaeology70%10%10%10%80%
Architecture / Built Environment70%10%10%10%80%
English Language and Literature80%10%10%90%
History60%10%15%15%70%
Philosophy75%5%10%10%80%
Communication and Media Studies50%10%20%20%60%
Development Studies60%10%15%15%70%
Library and Information Management70%10%15%5%80%
Politics and International Studies50%30%10%10%80%
Sociology70%10%5%15%80%
Geography60%10%15%15%70%
Materials Science40%10%20%20%10%50%
Anatomy and Physiology40%10%25%25%50%
Dentistry30%10%30%30%40%
Engineering — Chemical40%30%12.5%12.5%5%70%
Engineering — Civil and Structural40%30%15%15%70%
Engineering — Mechanical, Aeronautical40%30%12.5%12.5%5%70%
Source: QS World University Rankings by Subject 2024–2025 Methodology. Rep. Total = Academic Reputation + Employer Reputation combined weight.